CIR filed an amicus curiae brief in Community Financial Services Association of America v. FDIC, a suit brought by a group of payday lenders challenging “Operation Choke Point,” a broad investigation of banks and payment processors that do business with businesses deemed “undesirable” by Obama regulators, such as gun dealers, pawn shops, check cashers, charities, and payday lenders.
Obama officials contend that businesses in these fields have a high incidence of fraudulent business practices. But instead of investigating and prosecuting individual cases of fraud, officials devised “Operation Choke Point,” which forces banks and payment processors to themselves verify the integrity of their customers in these businesses or face regulatory sanctions.
To avoid the risk and expense of such investigations and penalties, most banks and payment processors are instead adopting blanket policies of simply refusing to do business with any business in any of the “undesirable” categories. As a result, hundreds of small businesses have lost their bank accounts even though they are accused of no wrongdoing and have violated no law. In one case, a small business owner lost her banking privileges because of Operation Choke Point and is now forced to drive 80 miles to the next nearest bank, despite her “A+” rating from the Better Business Bureau.
CIR represents William M. Isaac, a long time banking industry executive who was appointed by both Presidents Carter and Reagan to serve on the FDIC, including one term as Chairman. Isaac contends that many of the Obama Administration’s “undesirable” businesses provide legitimate services and play a crucial role in the economy. He notes that payday lenders provide a valuable service for consumers who do not have access to other sources of short-term loans.
The Obama Administration’s extra-legal effort to freeze out businesses it deems undesirable without any showing of illegal or fraudulent activity not only infringes on Congress’s authority to legislate industry wide standards, but represents an abuse of executive branch authority. As the brief notes, the same power the Obama Administration uses “today to choke off payday lending and ammunition dealers from banking services could tomorrow be used against convenience stores selling sugary sodas, restaurants selling high fat foods, or family planning clinics.”
More about this case: