Guam Inexplicably Delays Appeal

April 13, 2018

Locked in an appeal fight with CIR and Lead Counsel Gibson Dunn, the Government of Guam recently inexplicably declined an offer from the Ninth Circuit to expedite consideration of its appeal. CIR is challenging Guam’s plan to hold a race-exclusive plebiscite in violation of the 14th and 15th Amendments. After

Read More → Posted in Case Updates

CIR Plaintiffs Support Mark Janus at Supreme Court Rally

April 11, 2018

On Monday, February 26th, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Janus v. AFSCME. While attorneys argued inside the Court, CIR plaintiffs Ryan Yohn, Bruce Aster, and Darren Miller all traveled to Washington, D.C. to speak at a rally at the Supreme Court...

Read More → Posted in Case Updates, Yohn v. CTA

Yohn Plaintiffs Support Mark Janus at Supreme Court

Featured Video Play Icon February 23, 2018

On Monday, February 26th, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Janus v. AFSCME. The case is brought by Mark Janus, an Illinois public employee who is challenging compelled union dues. CIR filed an amicus brief in support of Janus on behalf of Ryan Yohn and the six other teacher

Read More → Posted in Case Updates

Federal Magistrate Recommends James Madison University Pay $850,000 In CIR Case

February 07, 2018

A federal magistrate judge has recommended that James Madison University pay nearly $850,000 in attorney’s fees for CIR’s case defending a JMU student who was suspended without due process. A university panel initially found the student, accused of sexual assault, not guilty. But thanks to a one-sided appeals system used

Read More → Posted in Case Updates

CIR Defends Free Speech In Class Action Case

February 07, 2018

The Center for Individual Rights recently filed a brief at the Supreme Court defending the free speech rights of plaintiffs in class action settlements. In Frank v. Gaos, plaintiffs are challenging a settlement of $8.5 million that Google agreed to pay for violating the privacy rights of their users. The

Read More → Posted in Case Updates

CIR Urges Supreme Court To End Compulsory Union Dues

December 06, 2017

On Wednesday December 6th, CIR filed an amicus brief before the Supreme Court on behalf of Ryan Yohn and six other teacher plaintiffs from Yohn v. CTA. Our brief asks the court to end compulsory union dues and burdensome opt-out requirements when it considers Janus v. AFSCME in early 2018.

CIR’s

Read More → Posted in Case Updates, Yohn v. CTA

Justice Department Joins CIR in Challenge to Voting Discrimination

November 29, 2017

On November 28th, the U.S. Justice Department filed an amicus brief before the Ninth Circuit in support of CIR client Dave Davis and his case against racial voting discrimination in Guam. The Justice Department brief fully supports CIR’s case and urges the Ninth Circuit to uphold our earlier victory in

Read More → Posted in Case Updates

Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Compelled Dues Case

October 03, 2017

On Thursday, September 28th, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Janus v. AFSCME, a case challenging compulsory union dues. If Janus is successful, the Court could restore teacher’s First Amendment rights and declare compulsory dues unconstitutional in all fifty states by next June.

This is a significant milestone in the fight

Read More → Posted in Case Updates

Watch Ryan Yohn Share His Story

Featured Video Play Icon August 03, 2017

Watch as Ryan Yohn explains what inspired him to become a teacher, his love of the profession, and why he decided to stand up for the right of teachers to decide for themselves whether or not to support a union. Watch and share his story.

Read More → Posted in Case Updates

Mark Janus files Union Dues Petition at Supreme Court

June 08, 2017

On June 6th, Mark Janus filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to hear his case, Janus v. AFSCME. Janus’ case seeks to end compulsory union dues.  His case is based on the same free speech argument that the Center for Individual Rights successfully brought to the Supreme Court in

Read More → Posted in Case Updates, Timeline, Yohn v. CTA