The nine teachers who are suing their union in Friedrichs v. CTA are doing so because they believe that many union stances taken in collective bargaining are bad for public schoolteachers and bad for the children they teach. They are asking the Court to rule that as individuals they haveRead More → Posted in Case Updates
The Union, the state of California, and the Obama administration, filed briefs last month in an attempt to justify their position that the First Amendment does not protect public school teachers. This week, CIR filed reply briefs that forcefully argue in defense of the First Amendment.
There is rarely any justificationRead More → Posted in Case Updates, Friedrichs, Timeline
As Rebecca Friedrichs’s landmark case speeds to the Supreme Court, CIR has created a Facebook and Twitter page to help share all the latest news in her fight to defend the First Amendment rights of teachers and other public employees.
You can hear from Friedrichs, other teachers from around the country, see theRead More → Posted in Case Updates
Twenty-four amicus briefs have been filed at the Supreme Court in support of compelled union dues. The parties who have signed on to the briefs include the Obama administration, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, and twenty-two union organizations.
A theme repeated throughout many of the briefs is that politicalRead More → Posted in Case Updates, Friedrichs
The California Teacher’s Association and the California Attorney General have filed briefs before the Supreme Court in response to CIR’s arguments on behalf of Rebecca Friedrichs and other public school teachers.
The Union’s brief argues that public employees, like Rebecca Friedrichs and other school teachers, can be compelled to support political activityRead More → Posted in Case Updates, Friedrichs
Like many government agencies, the Small Business Administration utilizes a system of racial preferences in the awarding of government contracts (called the “Section 8(a)” program). Unfortunately, when Congress created the Section 8(a) program, it failed to provide guidance to agencies on the basic question of what sort of small businessRead More → Posted in Case Updates, Uncategorized
It seems commonsense to say that the government should not spend public funds to support one particular candidate or cause in a public election, yet that is exactly what the government of Montgomery County, Maryland has done. In an ongoing case against the county, CIR has filed an amicus briefRead More → Posted in Case Updates
CIR plaintiff Arnold Davis is back in the U.S. District Court for the District of Guam to continue his challenge to Guam’s race-exclusive plebiscite. In 2013, this same District Court dismissed Davis’ lawsuit by saying he had no standing to sue the government of Guam. However, with CIR’s help, Davis appealedRead More → Posted in Case Updates
With a docket full of many cases that have the potential to change our nation’s history, multiple Supreme Court reporters have singled out CIR’s case of Friedrichs v. CTA as one of the top cases to watch. Even in a year filled with cases regarding religious freedom, privacy, voting rights, and many otherRead More → Posted in Case Updates
Twenty-five parties have filed amicus briefs at the Supreme Court in support of CIR’s case in Friedrichs v. CTA. The amicus briefs represent a broad and bipartisan coalition of individuals and organizations who agree that compulsory union dues are harmful to teachers, parents, and children.
The amici include former California SenateRead More → Posted in Case Updates, Friedrichs