Preliminary Injunction Filed Challenging the Commonwealth’s Ban on Non-Lethal Weapons

March 31, 2017

Boston, Massachusetts – Today, a preliminary injunction was filed asking the court to prohibit law enforcement from continuing to deprive Massachusetts citizens from exercising their 2nd Amendment right to own a non-lethal stun gun.

On February 16th, in a potentially precedent-setting lawsuit regarding self-defense rights of private citizens, three Massachusetts residents

Read More → Posted in Press Releases

CIR Files Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Massachusetts Stun-gun Ban

March 31, 2017

Yesterday the Center for Individual Rights filed a motion for preliminary injunction in the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts that asks the court to suspend Massachusetts’s ban on electric weapons as our case proceeds.

The motion asks Federal Judge Douglas Woodlock to bar Massachusetts authorities from enforcing the

Read More → Posted in Case Updates

Federal Judge Strike Down Race-based Guam Plebiscite

March 08, 2017

Washington, DC — US Federal Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood today struck down the Government of Guam’s plans to hold a referendum on the future relation of Guam to the United States.  Tydingco-Gatewood found that the plebiscite restricted participation to “Native Inhabitants of Guam” in violation of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth

Read More → Posted in Press Releases

Victory: Federal Court Declares Guam’s Race Restrictive Plebiscite Unconstitutional

March 08, 2017

On March 8th, Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood of the District Court of Guam issued a decision in favor of CIR client Arnold Davis. Judge Tydingco-Gatewood’s opinion granted Davis’ Motion for Summary Judgment and held Guam’s race exclusive plebiscite unconstitutional in light of the Fourteenth, and Fifteenth amendments to the Constitution.

Read More → Posted in Case Updates

CIR Asks Court to Move Union Dues Challenge Forward

March 01, 2017

CIR recently filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in our case against compulsory union dues. Since this case questions precedents previously set by the Supreme Court, and the district court does not have the authority to deviate

Read More → Posted in Case Updates, Timeline, Yohn v. CTA