NC NAACP seeks to intervene in voting rights case

July 07, 2010 − by CIR − in Blog, Case Updates − Comments Off on NC NAACP seeks to intervene in voting rights case

The North Carolina State Conference of Branches of the NAACP and several Kinston, NC residents moved to intervene as defendants in LaRoque v. Holder, CIR’s case challenging Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.  The proposed Defendant-Intervenors seek to defend the constitutionality of the preclearance provisions of Section 5, which the Justice Department used to prohibit Kinston from implementing a nonpartisan voting system favored by 63% of Kinston residents.  The Proposed Defendant-intervenors argue that their interest in protecting minority voting rights will not be adequately protected by the Department of Justice and so seek to intervene as additional parties in the case.

  • Read the NAACP motion to intervene

More about this case:



Print Friendly



Comments are closed.