|
Home >
CIR case finder
Query: Civil Rights cases
BAMN et al. v. Granholm, et al.
Representing Eric Russell, a 2007 applicant to several Michigan law schools in an effort to secure immediate and permanent implementation of Michigan's Amendment 26, which bars the use of racial preferences in all state programs.
Status: Pending. District court ruled Prop 2 constitutional; appeal before 6th Circuit
Doe v. Dept. Health and Human Services
Challenged exclusion of Caucasian youth from minorities-only summer study program funded in part by the National Institute of Health and Texas A&M University.
Status: Settled in client's favor
Dynalantic v. U.S. Dept. of Defense
Challenging federal government contracting '8(a)' minority set-aside program on behalf of manufacturer of military flight simulators.
Status: Pending. Motions relating to 2006 reauthorization filed in August 2007.
Gratz v. Bollinger
Challenged racial preferences in student admissions at the University of Michigan College of Literature, Sciences, and the Arts.
Status: Victory
Grutter v. Bollinger
Challenged racial preferences in student admissions at the University of Michigan Law School.
Status: Loss
Hopwood v. State of Texas
Challenged racial preferences in student admissions in landmark case against University of Texas Law School.
Status: Victory
Jacob v. Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 625
Challenged minority set-aside in public elementary magnet school.
Status: Settled in client's favor
Ng et al v. New York City Dept. of Education
CIR sued the NYC Department of Education on behalf of Asian and white parents whose children were not allowed to apply for a free program designed to help prepare middle school students for the admissions tests to New York's elite public high schools.
Status: Victory: case settled on favorable terms
Operation King's Dream v. Ward Connerly
Defended Michigan Civil Rights Initiative against challenge filed under federal Voting Rights Act. Victory before District Court; 6th Circuit upheld the District Court's ruling that BAMN could not demonstrate a violation of the Voting Rights Act.
Status: Victory
Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1
CIR filed amicus brief in case challenging race-based school assignment plan.
Status: Victory. 5-4 majority struck down racial balancing plan
Proposition 209
Successfully defended California ballot initiative that outlawed racial preferences against federal court challenge.
Status: Victory.
Rau and Katapadi v. NYC Dept. of Education
Represented student in challenge to racial quota in admissions at Mark Twain Intermediate School.
Status: Victory. City agreed to eliminate racial quota.
Ricci v. DeStefano
CIR filed amicus briefs in case challenging New Haven Connecticut decision to cancel results of firefighter hiring test due to political pressure from individuals advocating greater minority hiring.
Status: Pending
Russell v. Brandon, et al.
Class action lawsuit that asked Michigan state court to order immediate implementation of new amendment to Michigan Constitution barring the use of racial preferences by state agencies.
Status: Case withdrawn when state schools agreed to implement new amendment.
Smith v. University of Washington
Challenged racial preferences in student admissions at the University of Washington Law School.
Status: Loss
Smith v. Virginia Commonwealth University, et al.
Represented 15-year-old high school student who applied and was accepted to a summer journalism workshop, only to be informed shortly thereafter that she couldn't attend because she was white.
Status: Victory. Case settled on favorable terms.
Tompkins v. Alabama State University
Challenged court mandated 'whites only' scholarship at traditionally black university.
Status: Victory
U.S. v. NYC Bd. of Ed.; Brennan v. Mukasey, Miranda v. NYC Bd. of Ed.
Challenging proposed consent decree in ongoing litigation between U.S. Department of Justice and the New York City Board of Education over alleged discrimination in recruitment, hiring and promotion of custodians in the New York City school system.
Status: Pending. District court ruled most plaintiffs not entitled to relief; case on appeal to Second Circuit.
Worth v. Jackson
Challenged racial quotas in hiring and promotion at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Status: Loss.
 Last
revised: September 2, 2010
|
